Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Overseas Warriors

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:09, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Overseas Warriors[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable team, playing in a league which doesn't hold official T20 status. Fails WP:NCRIC inclusion guidelines. StickyWicket (talk) 23:34, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. StickyWicket (talk) 23:34, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:58, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:59, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:59, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The tournament doesn't hold T20 status but I don't think this should disqualify a club from having an article on them. Obviously notable players and staff have played/coached the team and the team draws coverage in the media for it's matches. Sure a player playing just for them shouldn't qualify for an article, but the team, other teams in the tournament itself, and the tournament can have pages on them. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 10:05, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per above opinion. Hamza Ali Shah ^Talk 14:17, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Neither Keep is based in policy. More discussion would be helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 02:38, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment the article passes WP:GNG. Hamza Ali Shah ^Talk 15:05, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Happy this meets GNG, just so long as players don't end up with articles if they haven't played FC/LA/T20 before! StickyWicket (talk) 19:47, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.